<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lie Detector Libel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artofinfosec.com/275/lie-detector-libel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artofinfosec.com/275/lie-detector-libel/</link>
	<description>Random Insights on Protecting Data, Privacy, and Digital Infrastructure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 03:27:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://artofinfosec.com/275/lie-detector-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofinfosec.com/?p=275#comment-761</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Thanks for the comment. &lt;/b&gt;

Yes, I should have been clearer about the fact that the article in question was focused on Voice Stress as the &quot;lie detection&quot; feature.

None the less, as far as I am aware there has never been a double-blind study of any lie detection technology. The danger in pseudo-science isn&#039;t that lie detection technology X works, but that it doesn&#039;t work but is used as a basis for significant decisions.

Cheers, Erik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Thanks for the comment. </b></p>
<p>Yes, I should have been clearer about the fact that the article in question was focused on Voice Stress as the &#8220;lie detection&#8221; feature.</p>
<p>None the less, as far as I am aware there has never been a double-blind study of any lie detection technology. The danger in pseudo-science isn&#8217;t that lie detection technology X works, but that it doesn&#8217;t work but is used as a basis for significant decisions.</p>
<p>Cheers, Erik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FoolsGold</title>
		<link>http://artofinfosec.com/275/lie-detector-libel/comment-page-1/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>FoolsGold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artofinfosec.com/?p=275#comment-760</guid>
		<description>The article deals with Voice Stress Analyzers and was published by a firm financially unable to afford lawyers in a UK court where libel laws are generous. The authors in failing to first contact the manufacturers involved appear to have been lacking in journalism ethics though I am sure such a contact would have been futile anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article deals with Voice Stress Analyzers and was published by a firm financially unable to afford lawyers in a UK court where libel laws are generous. The authors in failing to first contact the manufacturers involved appear to have been lacking in journalism ethics though I am sure such a contact would have been futile anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

